Subscribe | Archive | Random
Hall of Fame

About

I'm 25 and I come from all over New England. I collect old things and share them on the internet. Occasionally other things will find their way in as well.

If you enjoy my blog, please feel free to recommend it to others!

Credit

Unless otherwise credited, all photos, postcards, etc., are from my personal collection.

Also, the amusing quotes accompanying my photos are sometimes gleaned from TweetsofOld and sometimes from my own old-newspaper browsing.

Questions or Comments?

Direct them over here!

Search

Following


08 July 2010, 5:15 pm

I like your beard.

Thomas Sanders, an early partner in and first treasurer of the Bell Telephone Company, in 1878.

(via)

24 June 2010, 5:34 pm
The Vokes Family: Fawdon, Rosina, Victoria, Fred, and Jessie, ca. 1872.
(via)

The Vokes Family: Fawdon, Rosina, Victoria, Fred, and Jessie, ca. 1872.

(via)

20 June 2010, 10:37 pm

It seems, according to our old pal Orson Squire Fowler, that it’s not only women who despise the unmarried:

Celibacy is virtual self-emasculation. It destroys gender, either by inertia, if Amativeness remains inactive, or else by sensualizing it, if it is exercised. Every man unmarried at twenty-five who does exercise it is a libertine, but who does not is a virtual eunuch. Writhe under this, bachelors, as you may, there is no escape from this dilemma but in marriage. Either state unsexes.

“This excoriation is indeed awful. We thought you hard on the clergy, but, comparatively, you handle us with feline claws, them with gloves. Call us thieves, liars, cheats, swindlers, backlegs, even politicians, anything, but don’t, O in mercy, don’t call us eunuchs, mere unsexed things!”

This only calls you what your celibacy necessarily makes you. It but puts a natural problem plainly. Your own celibacy is your own castrator. You necessarily unman your own selves either by stifling your sexuality, if you love no female, or else by perverting it, if you exercise it out of wedlock. Better turn husband, and recuperate what little manhood remains to you, by at once initiating a true love marriage. Every male requires his female, and every female her male. “It is not good for man” or woman “to live alone.” Each was made for the other, as much as light and eyes, and are about as useless isolated. By common consent men look down upon the unmarried, perpetually hit them off by detracting jokes and ridicule, put them off with poor fare, as in boarding-houses, always “count them out,” except when wanted as makeshifts, and edge them round every way. If invited to a stylish party, it is to give some lady a chance to captivate, and save them and herself from this “lingering death.” Ever since “society” existed, “fathers of families” are aristocrats, dignitaries, privileged characters, enjoying special immunities and honors, and always ranking those who are not a pater-familias. What “old bach” ever “leads off” among the ton? It is married men who wield the influences and engross the honors of civic life, while you, baches, young and old, are nobodies, and never can be anybody till married.

From part 614, “Celibacy Deadens or Perverts Gender,” pp. 137-138.

04 June 2010, 9:16 pm

Specifications describing a new and Improved Moustache-Guard, invented by Eli J.F. Randolph, of New York City, in the county and State of New York.My invention consists of a curved plate with a flange, adapted to the form of the upper lip, so that, being suspended in front thereof, the flange will take under the moustache and hold it so as not to interfere with eating and drinking; while said plate is provided with two prongs projecting upward from the upper edges, adapted to enter the nostrils one on each side of the septum which divides them, and suspend said plate by hanging from the thickened part of said septum.

(via)

Specifications describing a new and Improved Moustache-Guard, invented by Eli J.F. Randolph, of New York City, in the county and State of New York.

My invention consists of a curved plate with a flange, adapted to the form of the upper lip, so that, being suspended in front thereof, the flange will take under the moustache and hold it so as not to interfere with eating and drinking; while said plate is provided with two prongs projecting upward from the upper edges, adapted to enter the nostrils one on each side of the septum which divides them, and suspend said plate by hanging from the thickened part of said septum.

(via)

01 June 2010, 11:18 pm
A mesh chin strap is just the thing to keep out the cold, but only if you’re a man or boy.
And later on, an improved version was patented that protected one’s moustache as well!
(via)

A mesh chin strap is just the thing to keep out the cold, but only if you’re a man or boy.

And later on, an improved version was patented that protected one’s moustache as well!

(via)

22 May 2010, 7:09 pm
Thanks for clearing that up, Horace.
Apparently even in the 1870s the caps lock key was an effective tool for showing everyone you really mean business.
(From the New York Times; July 8, 1872.)

Thanks for clearing that up, Horace.

Apparently even in the 1870s the caps lock key was an effective tool for showing everyone you really mean business.

(From the New York Times; July 8, 1872.)

20 May 2010, 11:36 pm

I like your haircut.

Name: John Walter

Age: 61

Offence: Stealing a shilling

Sentence:

Type of trial: Summarily

Height: 5 ft 4 ½ inches

Hair colour: Dark Brown

Eye colour: Grey

Complexion: Fresh

Trade or occupation: Litho printer

Marriage status: Widower

Number of children: Unknown

Birth parish: Marylebone

Residence parish: Ramsey

Entry date: 20th Oct 1872

(via)

13 May 2010, 9:26 pm
Eugenie Pappenheim, ca. 1876.
(via)

Eugenie Pappenheim, ca. 1876.

(via)

13 May 2010, 12:52 am

I think Orson might be a boob man.

As a female beautifier, no other toilet appendage bears any comparison with [the breasts]. Without them, or their cotton make-believes, any and all women, though dressed and painted to death in all other respects, appear insignificant, and unworthy of a second look. Men and women involuntarily turn from a flat female chest with disappointment, as if omitted to present something very important to good looks, and very desirable. As a face looks badly without a nose, so does the female chest without that full bust created by large and full breasts. Any woman is but poorly adorned if they are small and flattened, no matter how rich and gay her toilet; while she in whom they are large, round, and duly elevated, looks splendidly, though dressed in calico; for bountiful Nature has already ornamented her beyond all power of art to equal. Even a fine face with a poor bust disappoints, as showing a great want of something essential. The simple country maid in homespun, with a superb “bosom,” need not envy that jewelled princess who lacks it. Though till lately we have stoutly opposed “false bosoms,” yet women without genuine or else false ones do look so inferior, that, on reflection, we assent to their use as the “lesser evil.”

From “Sexual Science, Including Manhood, Womanhood, and Their Mutual Interrelations” by Orson Squire Fowler, 1870.

09 May 2010, 12:07 am

Better bring your mask if you want to dance before supper.

From the Puget Sound Mail; La Conner, Washington; November 8, 1879.

06 May 2010, 8:58 pm
“And don’t you forget it!”
Some handy hints from the Puget Sound Mail; La Conner, Washington; December 27, 1879.

“And don’t you forget it!”

Some handy hints from the Puget Sound Mail; La Conner, Washington; December 27, 1879.

01 May 2010, 12:25 pm
Jem Mace, ca. 1870.
(via)

Jem Mace, ca. 1870.

(via)

27 April 2010, 10:08 pm
Frank, Charles, and Marie Majilton, ca. 1871.
(via)
A photo of Marie in slightly less theatrical attire can be seen here.

Frank, Charles, and Marie Majilton, ca. 1871.

(via)

A photo of Marie in slightly less theatrical attire can be seen here.

20 April 2010, 11:58 pm
From “The American Almanac, Year-Book, Cyclopædia and Atlas of 1904,” p. 684.

From “The American Almanac, Year-Book, Cyclopædia and Atlas of 1904,” p. 684.

11 April 2010, 9:19 pm
From the Boulder County Courier; Boulder, Colorado; October 18, 1878.

From the Boulder County Courier; Boulder, Colorado; October 18, 1878.